← Back to Index

Chapter 14: Introduction to Modern Portfolio Theory

Module 5 — MPT framework, assumptions, investor risk attitudes, expected return & risk calculations, efficient frontier, optimization

14.1 Framework: Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT)

Diversification — "don't put all your eggs in one basket" — was known long before 1952, but investors had no way to quantify its benefits. In 1952, Harry Markowitz published "Portfolio Selection" in The Journal of Finance (he won the Nobel Prize in Economics in 1990).

MPT provides a framework for constructing and selecting portfolios based on (a) expected performance of investments and (b) the risk appetite of the investor. Markowitz introduced covariance/correlation to quantify diversification and mathematically demonstrated that variance of returns is a meaningful measure of portfolio risk.

Modern Portfolio
Theory
Expected Return of each asset
Risk (Std. Deviation) of each asset
Correlation among assets
Investor's risk-return preference / constraints

14.2 Assumptions of MPT

  • Investors want to maximize return for a given level of risk — given equal returns, they pick the lower-risk asset; each alternative is viewed as a probability distribution of expected returns over a holding period.
  • Investors maximize one-period expected utility, choosing the action with maximum expected utility, assigning utility scores to portfolio choices.
  • Utility curves show diminishing marginal utility of wealth — per-rupee increment to utility decreases as wealth increases.
  • Investors estimate portfolio risk based on the variability of expected returns of constituent assets.
  • Decisions are based solely on expected return and risk — utility is a function of expected return and expected variance (or standard deviation) only.

14.3 Risk Averse, Risk Seeking & Risk Neutral Investors

Investor TypeBehaviourCertainty Equivalent Rate (CER)
Risk AverseRejects a "fair game" (zero risk-premium prospect); invests in risk-free opportunities or those with positive expected risk premium. Greater the risk, greater the demanded premium. Makes a downward adjustment to utility for risk.Highly risk-averse investor may set CER below the risk-free rate and reject the risky portfolio; less risk-averse investor sets a higher CER and may accept it.
Risk NeutralEvaluates opportunities solely on expected return, with no regard to risk; the amount of risk is irrelevant; provides no penalty for risk.CER = Expected rate of return on the risky portfolio.
Risk SeekingWilling to engage in a "fair game"; makes an upward adjustment to utility (opposite of risk-averse investor).Assigns CER above the certainty-equivalent a risk-averse investor would assign.
Fair game: a prospect with a zero risk premium. Certainty Equivalent Rate (CER): the rate a risk-free investment must offer to be equally attractive as a given risky investment.

14.4 Calculating Expected Return & Risk

(a) Expected Return of an Individual Security

Expected Return = Σ (Probability of state × Return in that state)

Worked Example — Expected Return of Stocks A & B

StateProbabilityStock AStock B
I — Boom0.315%25%
II — Normal0.510%20%
III — Recession0.22%1%

RA = 0.3(15%) + 0.5(10%) + 0.2(2%) = 9.9%

RB = 0.3(25%) + 0.5(20%) + 0.2(1%) = 17.7%

(b) Variance & Standard Deviation of an Individual Security

Risk = variability in return. Standard deviation (square root of variance) is the most well-known risk measure — larger SD = greater dispersion = greater risk.

1. List yearly returns (X)
2. Compute mean return (X̄)
3. Find deviations (X − X̄)
4. Square deviations (X−X̄)²
5. Sum the squares
6. Divide by (n−1)
7. Take square root ⇒ Std. Deviation

(c) Expected Return of a Portfolio

Portfolio Expected Return = Weighted average of expected returns of constituent assets = Σ (Weighti × Expected Returni)

Worked Example — Four-Asset Portfolio

ConstituentWeight (% of portfolio)Expected ReturnWeighted Return
A0.20.090.018
B0.10.120.012
C0.30.150.045
D0.40.180.072

Expected Return of Portfolio = 0.018 + 0.012 + 0.045 + 0.072 = 0.147 (14.7%)

(d) Risk (Variance) of a Two-Security Portfolio

E(σ²port) = w₁²σ₁² + w₂²σ₂² + 2 w₁ w₂ r₁,₂ σ₁ σ₂

The first term is the weighted variance of investment 1, the second the weighted variance of investment 2, and the third the weighted covariance between 1 and 2 (covariance = correlation × SD1 × SD2).

Worked Example — Two-Security Portfolio Risk

Correlation coefficient (A,B)0.5
Expected return on A0.15
Std. deviation of A0.05
Expected return on B0.15
Std. deviation of B0.05
Weight of A & B0.50 each

E(σ²port) = (0.50² × 0.05²) + (0.50² × 0.05²) + (2 × 0.50 × 0.50 × 0.5 × 0.05 × 0.05)

E(σ²port) = 0.001875  ⇒  E(σport) = √0.001875 = 0.0433 (4.33%)

(e) Risk of a Three (or More) Security Portfolio

A 3-security portfolio variance has six terms: 3 weighted variances + 3 weighted covariances (I&II, II&III, I&III).

Number of covariance terms = (n² − n) / 2   [n = number of securities]

Worked Example — 50-Security Portfolio

Number of covariance terms = (50² − 50) / 2 = (2500 − 50)/2 = 1225 (in addition to the 50 individual variances).

14.5 Graphical Presentation of Portfolio Risk/Return (Two Securities)

If two securities are perfectly (positively) correlated, the risk-return opportunity set is a straight line connecting them — both portfolio return and SD are linear (weighted-average) combinations. There is no diversification benefit when correlation = +1.

As correlation falls below +1, the combination curve bows inward (to the left) — offering risk reduction through diversification, with the bowing becoming most pronounced as correlation approaches −1.

14.6 The Efficient Frontier

The Efficient Frontier is the set of optimal portfolios offering the highest expected return for a given level of risk, or the lowest risk for a given level of expected return. Plotting all feasible combinations of securities produces an "umbrella"-shaped curve — this curve is the Efficient Frontier.

Below the frontier: Sub-optimal — insufficient return for the risk taken.
To the right of the frontier: Sub-optimal — excess risk for the given return.
Sub-optimal
(below frontier)
Efficient Frontier
(umbrella-shaped curve of optimal portfolios)
Sub-optimal
(right of frontier)

14.7 Portfolio Optimization Process

An optimum portfolio combines investments with desirable risk-return characteristics for a given set of constraints. To use the MPT framework, the portfolio manager must estimate:

1. Expected return of every asset/security in the universe
2. Standard deviation of each asset's expected returns
3. Correlation coefficients among the entire set of assets
4. Specify any investor constraints
5. Select the portfolio meeting investment objectives from feasible combinations

14.8 Estimation Issues

The accuracy of portfolio allocation outputs depends entirely on the accuracy of statistical inputs (returns, risk, correlations). The number of correlation estimates required grows rapidly — for a 50-security portfolio there are 1225 correlation estimates (using (n²−n)/2). The potential error from these estimations is called estimation risk.

For larger portfolios, a variance-covariance matrix must be calculated — typically using spreadsheets or financial modelling tools.

Key Takeaways

  • MPT (Markowitz, 1952; Nobel 1990) provides a framework to construct/select portfolios using expected return, risk (variance/SD) and correlation/covariance.
  • Risk averse investors reject fair games and demand a risk premium; risk neutral investors look only at expected return; risk seeking investors accept fair games and adjust utility upward.
  • Expected return = probability-weighted sum of returns; Portfolio return = weighted average of constituent expected returns.
  • Two-security portfolio variance = w₁²σ₁² + w₂²σ₂² + 2w₁w₂r₁,₂σ₁σ₂; number of covariance terms = (n²−n)/2.
  • Perfect positive correlation (+1) ⇒ straight-line risk-return combination, no diversification benefit; lower correlation ⇒ curved/bowed combinations ⇒ diversification benefits.
  • The Efficient Frontier is the umbrella-shaped curve of optimal risk-return portfolios; portfolios below or to the right of it are sub-optimal.
  • Estimation risk grows fast with portfolio size (e.g., 1225 correlations for 50 securities) — requiring a variance-covariance matrix for large portfolios.

Self-Test Quiz

1. Stock A has expected returns of 15% (Boom, prob 0.3), 10% (Normal, prob 0.5) and 2% (Recession, prob 0.2). What is its expected rate of return?

2. In Markowitz's portfolio theory, what statistical measure did he use to quantify the benefit of diversification between two assets?

3. A risk-neutral investor's Certainty Equivalent Rate (CER) for a risky portfolio is:

4. For a portfolio of two securities with weight 0.5 each, both having standard deviation of 0.05 and correlation coefficient of 0.5, the portfolio variance E(σ²port) is approximately:

5. The Efficient Frontier represents: